Organic/Organic Heterojunctions in OLEDs - Revision history

Smhunter at 17:37, 16 July 2009

2009-07-16T17:37:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:37, 16 July 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:

	==Single-Layer OLEDs Band-Edge Offsets vs. Contact Electrodes==		==Single-Layer OLEDs Band-Edge Offsets vs. Contact Electrodes==
	This simplistic energy diagram describes an organic film sandwiched between two contacting electrodes. The anode is indium tin oxide ([[indium tin oxide\|ITO]]) and the cathode is aluminum. We assume there is constant vacuum level for all components, although this is not precisely correct. The ITO has a work function represented by the vertical arrow. For clean ITO this is typically 4.7 - 4.8ev. For dirty ITO it can be a low as 4- 4.2ev. The work function for Al is about 4.1ev. ~~We need a~~ work function difference between the layers ~~because we want~~ the aluminum to inject electrons into the organic layer, while the ITO layer injects holes into the organic layer. The work function offset helps dictate the voltage needed to activate the device.		This simplistic energy diagram describes an organic film sandwiched between two contacting electrodes. The anode is indium tin oxide ([[indium tin oxide\|ITO]]) and the cathode is aluminum. We assume there is constant vacuum level for all components, although this is not precisely correct. The ITO has a work function represented by the vertical arrow. For clean ITO this is typically 4.7 - 4.8ev. For dirty ITO it can be a low as 4- 4.2ev. The work function for Al is about 4.1ev. The work function difference between the layers allows the aluminum to inject electrons into the organic layer, while the ITO layer injects holes into the organic layer. The work function offset also helps dictate the voltage needed to activate the device.
	[[Image:OLED5-singlelayer.jpg \|thumb \| 400px\|Band Edge Offsets]]		[[Image:OLED5-singlelayer.jpg \|thumb \| 400px\|Band Edge Offsets]]
	The energy offset (ΔE<sub>h</sub>) is the organic layer's ionization potential, defined as the energy required to take an electron out to vacuum. This can be measured with a UV photoelectron spectrometer. There is typically not a good energy match between the ITO bottom contact and the organic layer, causing a small energy barrier that must be overcome in order to inject holes into the organic layer.		The energy offset (ΔE<sub>h</sub>) is the organic layer's ionization potential, defined as the energy required to take an electron out to vacuum. This can be measured with a UV photoelectron spectrometer. There is typically not a good energy match between the ITO bottom contact and the organic layer, causing a small energy barrier that must be overcome in order to inject holes into the organic layer.

Smhunter at 17:39, 15 July 2009

2009-07-15T17:39:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:39, 15 July 2009
Line 9:		Line 9:

	==Single-Layer OLEDs Band-Edge Offsets vs. Contact Electrodes==		==Single-Layer OLEDs Band-Edge Offsets vs. Contact Electrodes==
	This simplistic energy diagram ~~shows what happens to~~ an organic film ~~that is~~ sandwiched between two contacting electrodes. ~~One side~~ is indium tin oxide ([[indium tin oxide\|ITO]]) and the ~~other~~ is aluminum. We ~~are making the assumption that~~ there is constant vacuum level for all components ~~but~~ this is not precisely correct. The ITO has a work function represented by the vertical arrow. For clean ITO this is typically 4.7 - 4.8ev. For dirty ITO it can be a low as 4- 4.2ev. The work function for AL is about 4.1ev. We need a work function difference between the layers because we want the aluminum to inject electrons into the layer while the ITO layer ~~inject~~ holes into the layer. ~~This difference ultimately~~ helps dictate the voltage ~~that~~ the device ~~turns on~~.		This simplistic energy diagram describes an organic film sandwiched between two contacting electrodes. The anode is indium tin oxide ([[indium tin oxide\|ITO]]) and the cathode is aluminum. We assume there is constant vacuum level for all components, although this is not precisely correct. The ITO has a work function represented by the vertical arrow. For clean ITO this is typically 4.7 - 4.8ev. For dirty ITO it can be a low as 4- 4.2ev. The work function for Al is about 4.1ev. We need a work function difference between the layers because we want the aluminum to inject electrons into the organic layer, while the ITO layer injects holes into the organic layer. The work function offset helps dictate the voltage needed to activate the device.
	[[Image:OLED5-singlelayer.jpg \|thumb \| 400px\|Band Edge Offsets]]		[[Image:OLED5-singlelayer.jpg \|thumb \| 400px\|Band Edge Offsets]]
	~~There is an~~ energy offset ~~which~~ the ionization potential ~~of the organic layer~~, the energy required to take an electron out to vacuum. This ~~something that~~ can be measured with an UV photoelectron spectrometer. We typically do not ~~get~~ a good energy match between the ITO bottom contact and the organic layer~~. There is~~ small energy barrier that must be overcome in order to inject holes into the organic layer~~. If is small it’s not a big problem~~.		The energy offset (ΔE<sub>h</sub>) is the organic layer's ionization potential, defined as the energy required to take an electron out to vacuum. This can be measured with a UV photoelectron spectrometer. There is typically not a good energy match between the ITO bottom contact and the organic layer, causing a small energy barrier that must be overcome in order to inject holes into the organic layer.

	~~By the same token the~~ electron affinity EA is the distance between the vacuum level to the ~~lumo~~ state, ~~that is~~ the energy ~~required~~ to acquire an electron. Cathode materials have a bigger offset between the work function of the electrode and the electron affinity level. This is the energy barrier for injecting electrons into the organic layer. In an electrochemical system with a concentrated electrolyte solution ~~the same situation occurs~~ but it can be overcome by setting up an electrical double layer at the interface. The steep potential gradient at the interface makes it possible to get an electron injection regardless of the electrode work function. However in condensed phase environments, which have very low dielectric constants and no added ionic species ~~in them~~, these energy levels are significant. ~~Ultimately we have to go to high voltages and then tunnel~~ charges through the energy barriers or do thermionic emission to lower drive voltages.		The organic layer's electron affinity (EA) is the distance between the vacuum level and the LUMO state, defined as the energy needed to acquire an electron. Cathode materials have a bigger offset (ΔE<sub>e</sub>) between the work function of the electrode and the electron affinity level. This is the energy barrier for injecting electrons into the organic layer. The same phenomenon occurs in an electrochemical system with a concentrated electrolyte solution, but it can be overcome by setting up an electrical double layer at the interface. The steep potential gradient at the interface makes it possible to get an electron injection regardless of the electrode work function. However in condensed phase environments, which have very low dielectric constants and no added ionic species, these energy levels are significant. Tunneling charges through the energy barriers, or thermionic emission becomes necessary to lower drive voltages.

	In ~~the~~ early experiments with single crystal anthracene the charge ~~does~~ not move at the same rate. In this ~~case~~ the positive charge electrode which injects holes created a charge carrier that moves faster than the electron carrier. As a result most of the recombination occurs closer to the negative electrode. That is critical problem for display devices because the metal or metal like electrodes tend to quench ~~the~~ emissive states before they ~~can~~ give off ~~their~~ light~~. They act as an energy sink~~. This ~~minimized~~ the efficiency of the ~~devices~~ no matter how ~~hard they were driven~~. ~~That~~ was ~~the~~ state of the art before ~~the~~ two layer ~~OLED~~ were developed.		In early experiments with single crystal anthracene, the charge from the anode and the charge from the cathode did not move at the same rate. In this example, the positive charge electrode which injects holes created a charge carrier that moves faster than the electron carrier. As a result most of the recombination occurs closer to the negative electrode. That is critical problem for display devices because the metal or metal-like electrodes act as an energy sink, and tend to quench emissive states before they give off light. This minimizes the efficiency of the device no matter how much voltage is applied. This scenario was state-of-the-art before two-layer OLEDs were developed.

	==Organic/Organic’ Heterojunction Devices==		==Organic/Organic’ Heterojunction Devices==
	[[Image:OLED5-organic_heterojunction.jpg \|thumb\|\|400px \| Organic Heterojunction]]		[[Image:OLED5-organic_heterojunction.jpg \|thumb\|\|400px \| Organic Heterojunction]]
	~~This is the ubiquitous way of building a light~~ emitting thin film system~~. They all involve~~ at least one heterojunction. The transport layer (~~ETL~~) is ~~designed to be easy to oxidize typically~~ using bis tri aral amines. The electron transport layer is ~~somewhat~~ easier to reduce ~~that the hole transport layer (HTL)~~ and more difficult to oxidize ~~than the hole transport layer~~. In electrochemical ~~vernacular we want to find~~ chemicals that are easy to oxidize and form stable cation radicals, and ~~other side~~ chemicals that are easier to reduce and form stable radical anions. This results in an energy offset between the two organic layers ~~so that electrons once~~ injected into the ETL layer have a large energy barrier to surmount in order to move into the HTL. The holes injected into the HTL have a large barrier to move into ETL layer. As a consequence, at low applied fields the holes and electrons build up at or near the interface. ~~That~~ is the site of recombination ~~and this keeps the process away~~ from the ~~surface of the contacting~~ electrodes. This was a critically important advancement.		Light emitting thin film system are now built with at least one heterojunction- the interface between two organic layers. The hole transport layer (HTL) is easily oxidized, usually using bis tri aral amines. The electron transport layer (ETL) is easier to reduce and more difficult to oxidize. In electrochemical terms, the HTL should be composed of chemicals that are easy to oxidize and form stable cation radicals, and the ETL should be composed of chemicals that are easier to reduce and form stable radical anions. This results in an energy offset between the two organic layers. Electrons injected into the ETL layer have a large energy barrier to surmount in order to move into the HTL. The holes injected into the HTL have a large energy barrier to move into ETL layer. As a consequence, at low applied fields, the holes and electrons build up at or near the interface. The interface is the site of recombination, which improves device efficiency by keeping recombination from occurring near the electrodes. This was a critically important advancement.
	[[category:organic LED]]		[[category:organic LED]]

Smhunter at 20:37, 25 June 2009

2009-06-25T20:37:48Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:37, 25 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<table id="toc" style="width: 100%">		<table id="toc" style="width: 100%">
	<tr>		<tr>
	<td style="text-align: left; width: 33%">[[The ~~first~~ OLEDs\|Previous Topic]]</td>		<td style="text-align: left; width: 33%">[[The First OLEDs\|Previous Topic]]</td>
	<td style="text-align: center; width: 33%">[[Main_Page#Organic_Light_Emitting_Diodes\|Return to OLED Menu]]</td>		<td style="text-align: center; width: 33%">[[Main_Page#Organic_Light_Emitting_Diodes\|Return to OLED Menu]]</td>
	<td style="text-align: right; width: 33%">[[OLED Charge Mobilities\|Next Topic]]</td>		<td style="text-align: right; width: 33%">[[OLED Charge Mobilities\|Next Topic]]</td>

Cmditradmin at 22:48, 1 June 2009

2009-06-01T22:48:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:48, 1 June 2009
Line 21:		Line 21:
	This is the ubiquitous way of building a light emitting thin film system. They all involve at least one heterojunction. The transport layer (ETL) is designed to be easy to oxidize typically using bis tri aral amines. The electron transport layer is somewhat easier to reduce that the hole transport layer (HTL) and more difficult to oxidize than the hole transport layer. In electrochemical vernacular we want to find chemicals that are easy to oxidize and form stable cation radicals, and other side chemicals that are easier to reduce and form stable radical anions. This results in an energy offset between the two organic layers so that electrons once injected into the ETL layer have a large energy barrier to surmount in order to move into the HTL. The holes injected into the HTL have a large barrier to move into ETL layer. As a consequence, at low applied fields the holes and electrons build up at or near the interface. That is the site of recombination and this keeps the process away from the surface of the contacting electrodes. This was a critically important advancement.		This is the ubiquitous way of building a light emitting thin film system. They all involve at least one heterojunction. The transport layer (ETL) is designed to be easy to oxidize typically using bis tri aral amines. The electron transport layer is somewhat easier to reduce that the hole transport layer (HTL) and more difficult to oxidize than the hole transport layer. In electrochemical vernacular we want to find chemicals that are easy to oxidize and form stable cation radicals, and other side chemicals that are easier to reduce and form stable radical anions. This results in an energy offset between the two organic layers so that electrons once injected into the ETL layer have a large energy barrier to surmount in order to move into the HTL. The holes injected into the HTL have a large barrier to move into ETL layer. As a consequence, at low applied fields the holes and electrons build up at or near the interface. That is the site of recombination and this keeps the process away from the surface of the contacting electrodes. This was a critically important advancement.
	[[category:organic LED]]		[[category:organic LED]]

			<table id="toc" style="width: 100%">
			<tr>
			<td style="text-align: left; width: 33%">[[The first OLEDs\|Previous Topic]]</td>
			<td style="text-align: center; width: 33%">[[Main_Page#Organic_Light_Emitting_Diodes\|Return to OLED Menu]]</td>
			<td style="text-align: right; width: 33%">[[OLED Charge Mobilities\|Next Topic]]</td>
			</tr>
			</table>

Cmditradmin at 22:43, 1 June 2009

2009-06-01T22:43:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:43, 1 June 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	[[Main_Page#~~Organic_Light_Emitting_Diodes_-_OLED~~\|Return to OLED Menu]] \|		<table id="toc" style="width: 100%">
	[[OLED Charge Mobilities\|Next Topic]]		<tr>
			<td style="text-align: left; width: 33%">[[The first OLEDs\|Previous Topic]]</td>
			<td style="text-align: center; width: 33%">[[Main_Page#Organic_Light_Emitting_Diodes\|Return to OLED Menu]]</td>
			<td style="text-align: right; width: 33%">[[OLED Charge Mobilities\|Next Topic]]</td>
			</tr>
			</table>


	==Single-Layer OLEDs Band-Edge Offsets vs. Contact Electrodes==		==Single-Layer OLEDs Band-Edge Offsets vs. Contact Electrodes==
	This simplistic energy diagram shows what happens to an organic film that is sandwiched between two contacting electrodes. One side is indium tin oxide ([[indium tin oxide\|ITO]]) and the other is aluminum. We are making the assumption that there is constant vacuum level for all components but this is not precisely correct. The ITO has a work function represented by the vertical arrow. For clean ITO this is typically 4.7 - 4.8ev. For dirty ITO it can be a low as 4- 4.2ev. The work function for AL is about 4.1ev. We need a work function difference between the layers because we want the aluminum to inject electrons into the layer while the ITO layer inject holes into the layer. This difference ultimately helps dictate the voltage that the device turns on.		This simplistic energy diagram shows what happens to an organic film that is sandwiched between two contacting electrodes. One side is indium tin oxide ([[indium tin oxide\|ITO]]) and the other is aluminum. We are making the assumption that there is constant vacuum level for all components but this is not precisely correct. The ITO has a work function represented by the vertical arrow. For clean ITO this is typically 4.7 - 4.8ev. For dirty ITO it can be a low as 4- 4.2ev. The work function for AL is about 4.1ev. We need a work function difference between the layers because we want the aluminum to inject electrons into the layer while the ITO layer inject holes into the layer. This difference ultimately helps dictate the voltage that the device turns on.

Cmditradmin at 20:55, 29 April 2009

2009-04-29T20:55:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:55, 29 April 2009
Line 13:		Line 13:
	[[Image:OLED5-organic_heterojunction.jpg \|thumb\|\|400px \| Organic Heterojunction]]		[[Image:OLED5-organic_heterojunction.jpg \|thumb\|\|400px \| Organic Heterojunction]]
	This is the ubiquitous way of building a light emitting thin film system. They all involve at least one heterojunction. The transport layer (ETL) is designed to be easy to oxidize typically using bis tri aral amines. The electron transport layer is somewhat easier to reduce that the hole transport layer (HTL) and more difficult to oxidize than the hole transport layer. In electrochemical vernacular we want to find chemicals that are easy to oxidize and form stable cation radicals, and other side chemicals that are easier to reduce and form stable radical anions. This results in an energy offset between the two organic layers so that electrons once injected into the ETL layer have a large energy barrier to surmount in order to move into the HTL. The holes injected into the HTL have a large barrier to move into ETL layer. As a consequence, at low applied fields the holes and electrons build up at or near the interface. That is the site of recombination and this keeps the process away from the surface of the contacting electrodes. This was a critically important advancement.		This is the ubiquitous way of building a light emitting thin film system. They all involve at least one heterojunction. The transport layer (ETL) is designed to be easy to oxidize typically using bis tri aral amines. The electron transport layer is somewhat easier to reduce that the hole transport layer (HTL) and more difficult to oxidize than the hole transport layer. In electrochemical vernacular we want to find chemicals that are easy to oxidize and form stable cation radicals, and other side chemicals that are easier to reduce and form stable radical anions. This results in an energy offset between the two organic layers so that electrons once injected into the ETL layer have a large energy barrier to surmount in order to move into the HTL. The holes injected into the HTL have a large barrier to move into ETL layer. As a consequence, at low applied fields the holes and electrons build up at or near the interface. That is the site of recombination and this keeps the process away from the surface of the contacting electrodes. This was a critically important advancement.
			[[category:organic LED]]

128.95.39.42: /* Organic/Organic’ Heterojunction Devices */

2009-04-27T18:23:26Z

Organic/Organic’ Heterojunction Devices

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:23, 27 April 2009
Line 12:		Line 12:
	==Organic/Organic’ Heterojunction Devices==		==Organic/Organic’ Heterojunction Devices==
	[[Image:OLED5-organic_heterojunction.jpg \|thumb\|\|400px \| Organic Heterojunction]]		[[Image:OLED5-organic_heterojunction.jpg \|thumb\|\|400px \| Organic Heterojunction]]
	This is the ubiquitous way of building a light emitting thin film system. They all involve at least one heterojunction. The transport layer is designed to be easy to oxidize typically using bis tri aral amines. The electron transport layer is somewhat easier to reduce that the hole transport layer and more difficult to oxidize than the hole transport layer. In electrochemical vernacular we want to find chemicals that are easy to oxidize and form stable cation radicals, and other side chemicals that are easier to reduce and form stable radical anions. This results in an energy offset between the two organic layers so that electrons once injected into the ETL layer have a large energy barrier to surmount in order to move into the HTL. The holes injected into the HTL have a large barrier to move into ETL layer. As a consequence, at low applied fields the holes and electrons build up at or near the interface. That is the site of recombination and this keeps the process away from the surface of the contacting electrodes. This was a critically important advancement.		This is the ubiquitous way of building a light emitting thin film system. They all involve at least one heterojunction. The transport layer (ETL) is designed to be easy to oxidize typically using bis tri aral amines. The electron transport layer is somewhat easier to reduce that the hole transport layer (HTL) and more difficult to oxidize than the hole transport layer. In electrochemical vernacular we want to find chemicals that are easy to oxidize and form stable cation radicals, and other side chemicals that are easier to reduce and form stable radical anions. This results in an energy offset between the two organic layers so that electrons once injected into the ETL layer have a large energy barrier to surmount in order to move into the HTL. The holes injected into the HTL have a large barrier to move into ETL layer. As a consequence, at low applied fields the holes and electrons build up at or near the interface. That is the site of recombination and this keeps the process away from the surface of the contacting electrodes. This was a critically important advancement.

128.95.39.42: /* Single-Layer OLEDs Band-Edge Offsets vs. Contact Electrodes */

2009-04-27T18:07:49Z

Single-Layer OLEDs Band-Edge Offsets vs. Contact Electrodes

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:07, 27 April 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	[[OLED Charge Mobilities\|Next Topic]]		[[OLED Charge Mobilities\|Next Topic]]
	==Single-Layer OLEDs Band-Edge Offsets vs. Contact Electrodes==		==Single-Layer OLEDs Band-Edge Offsets vs. Contact Electrodes==
	This simplistic energy diagram shows what happens to an organic film that is sandwiched between two contacting electrodes. One side is [[indium tin oxide\|ITO]] ~~(ITO~~) and the other is aluminum. We are making the assumption that there is constant vacuum level for all components but this is not precisely correct. The ITO has a work function represented by the vertical arrow. For clean ITO this is typically 4.7 - 4.8ev. For dirty ITO it can be a low as 4- 4.2ev. The work function for AL is about 4.1ev. We need a work function difference between the layers because we want the aluminum to inject electrons into the layer while the ITO layer inject holes into the layer. This difference ultimately helps dictate the voltage that the device turns on.		This simplistic energy diagram shows what happens to an organic film that is sandwiched between two contacting electrodes. One side is indium tin oxide ([[indium tin oxide\|ITO]]) and the other is aluminum. We are making the assumption that there is constant vacuum level for all components but this is not precisely correct. The ITO has a work function represented by the vertical arrow. For clean ITO this is typically 4.7 - 4.8ev. For dirty ITO it can be a low as 4- 4.2ev. The work function for AL is about 4.1ev. We need a work function difference between the layers because we want the aluminum to inject electrons into the layer while the ITO layer inject holes into the layer. This difference ultimately helps dictate the voltage that the device turns on.
	[[Image:OLED5-singlelayer.jpg \|thumb \| 400px\|Band Edge Offsets]]		[[Image:OLED5-singlelayer.jpg \|thumb \| 400px\|Band Edge Offsets]]
	There is an energy offset which the ionization potential of the organic layer, the energy required to take an electron out to vacuum. This something that can be measured with an UV photoelectron spectrometer. We typically do not get a good energy match between the ITO bottom contact and the organic layer. There is small energy barrier that must be overcome in order to inject holes into the organic layer. If is small it’s not a big problem.		There is an energy offset which the ionization potential of the organic layer, the energy required to take an electron out to vacuum. This something that can be measured with an UV photoelectron spectrometer. We typically do not get a good energy match between the ITO bottom contact and the organic layer. There is small energy barrier that must be overcome in order to inject holes into the organic layer. If is small it’s not a big problem.

128.95.39.42: /* Single-Layer OLEDs Band-Edge Offsets vs. Contact Electrodes */

2009-04-27T18:06:43Z

Single-Layer OLEDs Band-Edge Offsets vs. Contact Electrodes

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:06, 27 April 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	[[OLED Charge Mobilities\|Next Topic]]		[[OLED Charge Mobilities\|Next Topic]]
	==Single-Layer OLEDs Band-Edge Offsets vs. Contact Electrodes==		==Single-Layer OLEDs Band-Edge Offsets vs. Contact Electrodes==
	This simplistic energy diagram shows what happens to an organic film that is sandwiched between two contacting electrodes. One side is [indium tin oxide\|ITO] (ITO) and the other is aluminum. We are making the assumption that there is constant vacuum level for all components but this is not precisely correct. The ITO has a work function represented by the vertical arrow. For clean ITO this is typically 4.7 - 4.8ev. For dirty ITO it can be a low as 4- 4.2ev. The work function for AL is about 4.1ev. We need a work function difference between the layers because we want the aluminum to inject electrons into the layer while the ITO layer inject holes into the layer. This difference ultimately helps dictate the voltage that the device turns on.		This simplistic energy diagram shows what happens to an organic film that is sandwiched between two contacting electrodes. One side is [[indium tin oxide\|ITO]] (ITO) and the other is aluminum. We are making the assumption that there is constant vacuum level for all components but this is not precisely correct. The ITO has a work function represented by the vertical arrow. For clean ITO this is typically 4.7 - 4.8ev. For dirty ITO it can be a low as 4- 4.2ev. The work function for AL is about 4.1ev. We need a work function difference between the layers because we want the aluminum to inject electrons into the layer while the ITO layer inject holes into the layer. This difference ultimately helps dictate the voltage that the device turns on.
	[[Image:OLED5-singlelayer.jpg \|thumb \| 400px\|Band Edge Offsets]]		[[Image:OLED5-singlelayer.jpg \|thumb \| 400px\|Band Edge Offsets]]
	There is an energy offset which the ionization potential of the organic layer, the energy required to take an electron out to vacuum. This something that can be measured with an UV photoelectron spectrometer. We typically do not get a good energy match between the ITO bottom contact and the organic layer. There is small energy barrier that must be overcome in order to inject holes into the organic layer. If is small it’s not a big problem.		There is an energy offset which the ionization potential of the organic layer, the energy required to take an electron out to vacuum. This something that can be measured with an UV photoelectron spectrometer. We typically do not get a good energy match between the ITO bottom contact and the organic layer. There is small energy barrier that must be overcome in order to inject holes into the organic layer. If is small it’s not a big problem.

128.95.39.42: /* Single-Layer OLEDs Band-Edge Offsets vs. Contact Electrodes */

2009-04-27T18:06:17Z

Single-Layer OLEDs Band-Edge Offsets vs. Contact Electrodes

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:06, 27 April 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	[[OLED Charge Mobilities\|Next Topic]]		[[OLED Charge Mobilities\|Next Topic]]
	==Single-Layer OLEDs Band-Edge Offsets vs. Contact Electrodes==		==Single-Layer OLEDs Band-Edge Offsets vs. Contact Electrodes==
	This simplistic energy diagram shows what happens to an organic film that is sandwiched between two contacting electrodes. One side is indium tin oxide and the other is aluminum. We are making the assumption that there is constant vacuum level for all components but this is not precisely correct. The ITO has a work function represented by the vertical arrow. For clean ITO this is typically 4.7 - 4.8ev. For dirty ITO it can be a low as 4- 4.2ev. The work function for AL is about 4.1ev. We need a work function difference between the layers because we want the aluminum to inject electrons into the layer while the ITO layer inject holes into the layer. This difference ultimately helps dictate the voltage that the device turns on.		This simplistic energy diagram shows what happens to an organic film that is sandwiched between two contacting electrodes. One side is [indium tin oxide\|ITO] (ITO) and the other is aluminum. We are making the assumption that there is constant vacuum level for all components but this is not precisely correct. The ITO has a work function represented by the vertical arrow. For clean ITO this is typically 4.7 - 4.8ev. For dirty ITO it can be a low as 4- 4.2ev. The work function for AL is about 4.1ev. We need a work function difference between the layers because we want the aluminum to inject electrons into the layer while the ITO layer inject holes into the layer. This difference ultimately helps dictate the voltage that the device turns on.
	[[Image:OLED5-singlelayer.jpg \|thumb \| 400px\|Band Edge Offsets]]		[[Image:OLED5-singlelayer.jpg \|thumb \| 400px\|Band Edge Offsets]]
	There is an energy offset which the ionization potential of the organic layer, the energy required to take an electron out to vacuum. This something that can be measured with an UV photoelectron spectrometer. We typically do not get a good energy match between the ITO bottom contact and the organic layer. There is small energy barrier that must be overcome in order to inject holes into the organic layer. If is small it’s not a big problem.		There is an energy offset which the ionization potential of the organic layer, the energy required to take an electron out to vacuum. This something that can be measured with an UV photoelectron spectrometer. We typically do not get a good energy match between the ITO bottom contact and the organic layer. There is small energy barrier that must be overcome in order to inject holes into the organic layer. If is small it’s not a big problem.